My Plight with One-Ply

One ply. . nondrinker: nondrinker: why does pne ply toilet paper exist i honestly prefer single ply, it feels lighter and more effective and the drolls last han

So there are two things I hate in this world so much that the thought of them physically pains me. Really thin, useless serviettes, and goddam ONE-PLY TOILET PAPER.

If you buy one-ply toilet paper for your home, I have some news for you. You aren't human. The small amount of money you save from buying one-ply is NOT worth subjecting yourself to the horrors of wiping your arse with practically nothing. One-ply is so shit, that you'd get the same result from wiping with your bare hand. Doesn't matter how much of it you take off the roll, scruch together or fold into a neat little package, it ALWAYS seeps through to your hand. Because one-ply toilet paper is TRASH.

Almost every public toilet uses this stuff too. But it's always THAT much worse than usual. Not only is it one-ply, but you can only take it ONE SHEET AT A TIME. Who actually thought that was good design? Yeah sure, prevent people from using more than they need by making it a chore. Except for the fact that you ALWAYS need a lot of it because it's that one-ply sandpaper peasant-level GARBAGE. Its at that point where if you enter a public toilet with decent toilet paper, it's actually a high conversation topic.

There are a lot of things people should buy cheaper alternatives for to save money, but toilet paper is not one of them. No... toilet paper should be a luxury. Whenever my parents go away, I like to treat myself with somma dat quilton four-ply toilet paper. MMMMM-MMM, makes my arse feel like a damn queen. Everyone deserves this. Always.

Thank you.

1. Image source is from tumblr.com. Content creators are shown in the image.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Internet Semantics: Zippidy Zoppidy give me the Boppidy

Lauren Girardin's published an article on govloop.com about The 7 Barriers to Digital Communication . I'd like to talk about one of these barriers in particular, the Semantic barrier. Semantics refers to the way something is interpreted, aka its meaning. For example, the word "yeet" formally means to throw. But through internet usage it has evolved to mean so much more. If I ask my friend if she is still interested in hanging out and she responds with "yeet", we would both interpret that as her saying "yes, I'm still interested". But if I were to say "yeet" to my mother, she would NOT interpret that in the same way, in fact, she would be very confused. This is an example of semantics. The language of the internet is in a league of its own and only people who use the internet in certain ways are able to understand it. Humour in particular has been so warped that what makes most things funny is that they should not be funny, or that t...
Read more

4chan, 8chan, and Liveleak blocked in Australia

  This is absolutely outrageous. There are horrible things happening all over the world all the time. I mean no disrespect to the victims of the NZ mosque shooting when I say this, but why is there so much censorship after this particular event? What makes the footage of THIS shooting more awful than any other? Why is THIS shooting causing so much outrage in the media in comparison to videos of Mexican cartels flaying people alive. Yeah, that's just on the internet. Do I ever want to go to Brazil? Nope, not after what I've seen. If a Chinese person dies at work or in public you can guarantee it's on the internet for millions of eyes to view. Most school shootings and other public shootings are captured by onlookers, victims, or even the offenders themselves. Internet users globally, have seen it all. So why are all of THESE things fine, but not this ONE shooting? The footage of this shooting got put on the internet and now moderators of websites, ISPs and now Tel...
Read more

The Pink Tax

Image
Does this come in pink? Okay, so you’ve probably heard of  ‘The Pink Tax’  before. Particularly if you call yourself a feminist. This  ‘Pink Tax’  refers to the fact that products marketed towards women cost more than  similar  products that are marketed towards men (e.g. razors, body wash, most self-care products). The theory is that  women pay more for the same products as men , which is entirely false. It gives off the impression that cashiers add some  female-fee  to your total regardless of what you buy at the supermarket. No, people are complaining that  similar  products have different costs. The facts are that the  female equivalent of some products cost more than the male ones because they contain more or different ingredients. That should seem logical to everyone, right?   For example, razors. When I go to buy myself a razor, my eyes find their way to the wall of pink and they almost bulge out of my head wh...
Read more